Skip to content
Mystorae

Five of Swords

A field won, but at a cost the source calls degrading, dropped swords, retreating figures, and a man marked by disdain rather than honour.

Upright

  • degradation
  • dishonour
  • loss
  • infamy
  • revocation
  • a hollow victory

This card traditionally points to a victory that leaves a bad taste, a field won at the cost of something the source calls degrading or dishonourable. It doesn't describe a clean win or a clean loss; it describes someone standing over discarded weapons while others walk away. The source is blunt about the loss and shame in this scene rather than reframing it as a lesson learned, and that bluntness is worth sitting with rather than smoothing over.

Traditional meaning.

The source names this outcome plainly and without softening: degradation, destruction, revocation, infamy, dishonour, loss. This is a card of a win that costs the winner something. The source does not offer a consoling reframe, it sits with the ugliness of the result rather than explaining it away.

Symbolism

A disdainful man watches two dejected figures retreat, their swords abandoned on the ground. He carries two more swords over his own left shoulder and holds a third point-down in his right hand. The source names him plainly: he is the master in possession of the field. The image is of a field cleared by defeat, not by contest, the swords on the ground outnumber the ones in play, and the man left standing is marked by disdain, not by triumph.

In this context

A relationship
In matters of connection, this can reflect a disagreement where being right or having the last word left the relationship worse off. The source's language of degradation and revocation may point toward something withdrawn or broken between people rather than resolved.
Work or direction
This can point toward a workplace win that came at a cost to trust or standing, outmanoeuvring someone in a way that technically succeeded but left a mark. The source's terms, infamy and dishonour, are worth taking seriously rather than reading past.
A decision I am weighing
This may point toward weighing whether a choice that looks like a win is one you'd still stand behind afterward. The source frames this as a moment to ask what a victory actually costs, not just whether it can be had.
Something about myself
This can reflect a pattern of prevailing at a cost, of walking away 'in possession of the field' but alone there. The source's bluntness about dishonour and loss can be an invitation to look at what winning has meant in practice, not in theory.

Sit with this

  • Where in your life does the source's language of a costly victory feel familiar right now?
  • Is there a 'field' you're currently standing in possession of, and what did holding it require?
  • The source names disdain in the man who remains, does that quality show up anywhere in how you've handled a recent conflict?
  • What would it mean to call a recent win 'degrading,' even partly, the way this source does?

Reversed

  • defeat
  • retreat
  • burial
  • loss accepted
  • the field abandoned

In the source, this reversed card doesn't undo the upright picture of a loss and a walk away from the field, it sits alongside it and adds the image of a burial, a funeral rite. That is Waite's own word choice, not a softer modern gloss: something is being formally laid to rest, closed out, rather than revisited or reopened.

Traditional meaning.

Waite gives the reversed meaning as 'the same' as upright, plus 'burial and obsequies', funeral rites. Reversed does not soften or reverse the upright defeat and dejection; it adds an image of laying something to rest, formally and with ceremony, rather than fighting on.

Symbolism

The upright image stands: a disdainful man holds the field, two swords on his shoulder, a third point-down in his hand, while two defeated figures walk away, their swords left on the ground. Reversed keeps this scene but Waite attaches 'burial and obsequies' to it, the funeral rites that follow a loss, the formal close put on something once it is over.

In this context

conflict
Where the upright card shows one side holding the field and two others leaving it, reversed adds the image of rites performed afterward, a formal end put on the matter rather than a continued dispute.
Something about myself
Waite's 'burial and obsequies' can be read as marking a formal close to something, a chapter, an attempt, a version of a plan, rather than a call to keep contesting it.
transition
The pairing of defeat with burial rites can reflect a passage that is being marked and closed, with ceremony, rather than one still being fought.

Sit with this

  • Is there something in this situation you have already lost, but haven't yet let yourself close?
  • What would it look like to mark an ending here formally, rather than continuing to revisit it?
  • Whose side of this scene, the one holding the field, or the ones walking away, feels closer to where you stand?

Sit with this

Each meaning is written by us and grounded in A. E. Waite’s The Pictorial Key to the Tarot (1910), which is in the public domain. Nothing appears here until a person has read it.

Draw a free card

Source: Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot (1910), public domain. Five of Swords (p. 91). Knowledge version 0.1.0.